Who we are
IWI currently has a 15-person team working across research, editorial, audience, community and technology. We are still a young organisation, but we are building for institutional scale rather than operating as a conventional publication alone.
Our current readership is growing quickly as our research library and audience expand. We do not publish an unverified headline audience figure. Our stated growth ambition is to build IWI toward 3 million monthly visitors within the next six months, supported by stronger research products, technical infrastructure, search discovery and direct audience channels.
We are actively expanding the team. Current openings include a Software Engineer, a Journalist and a Volunteer Community Builder.
View open rolesWhat we publish
Our work spans foreign policy, security, trade, technology, antisemitism, diplomacy, political economy and regional affairs. We publish both timely analysis and products that are meant to become permanent reference infrastructure.
- IWI Briefings, our evergreen explainers on institutions, agreements and policy frameworks.
- Global Antisemitism Tracker, a maintained research product bringing together national and institutional evidence.
- Research Topics, which organise work around persistent policy areas rather than chronology alone.
- Public-interest petitions, which create a participation layer around selected issues.
Funding and independence
IWI is funded through a mix of donations and supporters, investment into the organisation and its growth, and advertising and commercial partnerships.
These revenue streams support our research, editorial work, technology, audience development and operating costs. Funding does not purchase editorial conclusions. Advertisers and commercial partners do not receive approval over independent editorial coverage, and paid or sponsored material is intended to be clearly identified as such.
We believe transparency about how the organisation is funded is part of maintaining reader trust, especially for a publication working on politically contested subjects.
Editorial standards
Our aim is to distinguish factual reporting, analysis and institutional explanation as clearly as possible. We prioritise primary sources where available, including government publications, legislation, official datasets, regulatory material, international institutions, company disclosures and original documents.
Where sources disagree or methodologies differ, our job is to show that difference rather than flatten it into a single unsupported number. This is particularly important in comparative research products such as the Antisemitism Tracker.
Corrections and updates
We correct factual errors when identified and update research products as underlying evidence changes. Where a change materially alters the interpretation of a piece, the update should be visible to readers rather than silently rewriting the record.
AI-assisted tools
We may use AI-assisted systems for research support, classification, internal linking, document processing and workflow automation. Editorial responsibility remains with the human team. AI output is not treated as a source in itself.
Our locations
London
We maintain office space in London for team members, meetings, research collaboration and partner activity.
Tel Aviv
We maintain office space in Tel Aviv, placing part of the team close to many of the institutions, companies and communities central to our coverage.
Our wider team also works remotely, and we are structured to collaborate across locations and time zones.
Contact and participation
Readers can explore our authors, follow our research topics, join the IWI community or review current opportunities on our careers page.