Original research · Version 1.1

Global Analyst Ratings Research Index

A permanent index of Global Markets Review's dated analyst-rating, price-target and consensus research, designed to preserve the reporting context of each brokerage action.

Last reviewed: 2026-09-08. Values remain tied to their stated source and project or regulatory stage. Missing values are not estimated.
Download current CSVDownload observations CSVFull methodology
Records

44

Rows or archive records currently included under this product's stated inclusion rules.

Source domains

1

Distinct source domains visible in the current research table. Archive indexes can also contain source labels retained inside the underlying articles.

Review schedule

Daily archive refresh on publication days, with monthly methodology review.

The review cadence is part of the dataset methodology. Material events can trigger an earlier update.

Version control

v1.1

Last reviewed 2026-09-08. Historical observations are preserved rather than silently rewritten where context matters.

Dataset measure

Indexed research items

44

Dataset measure

Categories represented

1

Dataset measure

Primary topics represented

44

Dataset measure

Coverage window

2026-05-12 to 2026-09-14

Dataset measure

Structured observations

10

What the research currently shows

The index preserves rating actions as historical observations rather than overwriting prior calls with the latest target.

Currency and listing identity matter: targets for a European ordinary share are not automatically comparable with a US ADR unless conversion and security identity are explicit.

Questions this dataset is built to answer

  • Which brokerage changed a rating or price target, on what date and for which security?
  • Was the action an upgrade, downgrade, initiation, reiteration or target-only change?
  • How does a broker target differ from consensus and from the current market price?

Rating action

A dated brokerage recommendation change or initiation attributed to a named research provider.

Price target

A broker's stated target for a defined security and currency; it is not a forecast guarantee.

Consensus

Aggregated analyst measure from an attributable data source, kept separate from any individual broker view.

Historical action

A dated research event preserved even after a later action supersedes the current recommendation.

Source hierarchy

  1. Primary official sources, company filings, regulator publications and operator disclosures are preferred for factual dataset records.
  2. High-quality wire reporting or specialist trade reporting with an explicit attributable source trail may be used where it adds a dated physical-project fact not available in a practical first-party source.
  3. Secondary press, estimates and promotional claims are not promoted into dataset facts unless their status and provenance are clearly labelled.

Data quality controls

  • Observation date and publication date are kept distinct where the underlying fact is time-sensitive.
  • Announced, planned, under-construction and operating states are not collapsed into one status.
  • Parent programme IDs distinguish child-site milestones from wider investment programmes so nested values are not silently double counted.
  • Reported results, management guidance, analyst opinions and policy targets remain separate evidence classes.
  • Missing values remain missing rather than being filled with inferred or modelled estimates.
  • Historical observations preserve earlier stated values and milestones rather than silently replacing them with the newest figure.
  • Material revisions are recorded so later updates do not erase the historical basis of an earlier observation.
Revision history

8 Sep 2026: strengthened action-type, currency and historical-observation definitions.

Evidence timeline

These dated observations preserve additional evidence about how investment commitments, project stages, regulatory milestones and ecosystem measures changed over time. They are not treated as additional current totals. Where a later disclosure supersedes an earlier figure, both observations remain visible with their dates and source context.

Global Analyst Ratings Research Index: historical observations. Showing 10 of 10 records.
2026-08-27Nvidia / Raymond JamesStrong Buy; target raised from $352 to $515United StatesOpen sourcePost-earnings target change preserved with prior target.
2026-08-27Nvidia / Evercore ISIOutperform; target raised from $413 to $465United StatesOpen sourceHistorical analyst-action record.
2026-08-27Nvidia / BernsteinOutperform; target raised from $315 to $400United StatesOpen sourceHistorical analyst-action record.
2026-08-27Nvidia / J.P. MorganOverweight; target raised from $280 to $320United StatesOpen sourceHistorical analyst-action record.
2026-09-01Nvidia / BairdOutperform reiterated with $500 price targetUnited StatesOpen sourceGMR record of a named Baird analyst action. Target is an analyst opinion, not a forecast guarantee.
2026-09-04Nvidia / RosenblattBuy reiterated with $390 targetUnited StatesOpen sourceDated action retained separately from later or earlier targets.
2026-09-04Nvidia / NeedhamBuy reiterated with $300 targetUnited StatesOpen sourceSame rating as Rosenblatt but materially different valuation, useful for measuring dispersion.
2026-09-04Broadcom AI-revenue valuation debatePost-results analyst actions included both target increases and target reductions after the company's AI outlookUnited StatesOpen sourceSecond Broadcom observation preserves the sequence of the post-results rerating debate.
2026-09-06Snowflake post-earnings analyst resetAt least 34 brokerages raised price targets; Wells Fargo set a $525 target according to cited Reuters reportingUnited StatesOpen sourceAggregate analyst-reaction observation. Broker count and highest cited target are not presented as consensus.
2026-09-08Broadcom post-Q3 analyst splitMacquarie upgraded to Outperform while several firms cut targets and others raised themUnited StatesOpen sourceClassification focuses on dispersion of actions rather than forcing a single bullish or bearish label.
Global Analyst Ratings Research Index, version 1.1. Showing 44 of 44 records.
2026-09-14Intel's Analyst Targets Are Splitting as Its Operating Recovery Acceleratesanalyst ratingsIntel price targetIntel: Q2 2026 financial resultsOpen source
2026-09-09GMR Analyst Actions Database: The Fields Behind Upgrades, Downgrades and Price-Target Changesanalyst ratingsanalyst actions databaseGlobal Markets Review editorial methodology.Open source
2026-09-09Analyst Upgrades: Lineage and Airbnb Lead the Latest Verified Rating Changesanalyst ratingsanalyst upgrades September 9 2026MarketScreener analyst recommendations, 9 Sep 2026Open source
2026-09-09Analyst Downgrades: Westlake Heads the Latest Verified Rating Cutsanalyst ratingsanalyst downgrades September 9 2026MarketScreener analyst recommendations, 9 Sep 2026Open source
2026-09-09Price Target Changes: Workday, Block, Chime, American Airlines and ServiceTitananalyst ratingsprice target changes September 9 2026MarketScreener analyst recommendations, 9 Sep 2026Open source
2026-09-09Stock Upgrades Today: How GMR Tracks Genuine Analyst Recommendation Changesanalyst ratingsstock upgrades todayGlobal Markets Review analyst-actions methodology.Open source
2026-09-09Stock Downgrades Today: Tracking Real Rating Cuts Without the Noiseanalyst ratingsstock downgrades todayGlobal Markets Review analyst-ratings methodology.Open source
2026-09-09Price Target Changes Today: A Better Way to Read Analyst Target Raises and Cutsanalyst ratingsprice target changes todayGlobal Markets Review analyst-ratings methodology.Open source
2026-09-09Analyst Price Target Dispersion: Why the Range Can Matter More Than the Averageanalyst ratingsanalyst price target dispersionGlobal Markets Review methodology, brokerage-consensus conventions and investor-education principles. Analyst targets are forecasts, not guarantees.Open source
2026-09-09How an Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades Tracker Should Be Builtanalyst ratingsanalyst upgrades downgrades trackerGlobal Markets Review editorial methodology based on brokerage research conventions and public market disclosures.Open source
2026-09-09Earnings Estimate Revisions Tracker: What Rising and Falling Consensus Actually Signalsanalyst ratingsearnings estimate revisions trackerGlobal Markets Review methodology for analyst and earnings coverage. Consensus estimates are aggregates and should not be treated as guaranteed outcomes.Open source
2026-09-09Analyst Consensus Strength: A Better Way to Read Buy, Hold and Sell Distributionanalyst ratingsanalyst consensus strengthGlobal Markets Review methodology. Any future score should disclose its components and should not be presented as investment advice.Open source
2026-09-08Snowflake Price Targets Surge After Earnings: Why Wall Street Now Sees Up to $525analyst ratingsSnowflake price targetSnowflake Investor Relations: Q2 FY2027 materialsOpen source
2026-09-08Broadcom Price Targets Split After Earnings Despite 221% AI Revenue Growthanalyst ratingsBroadcom price targetBroadcom: Q3 fiscal 2026 financial resultsOpen source
2026-09-08Samsara Price Targets Rise After $2.1 Billion ARR Milestone: What Analysts See Nextanalyst ratingsSamsara price targetSamsara Investor Relations: Q2 FY2027 resultsOpen source
2026-09-07Overweight vs Buy: What the Two Analyst Ratings Actually Meananalyst ratingsoverweight vs buy ratingFINRA: Research AnalystsOpen source
2026-09-07Equal Weight vs Hold: Why Neutral Analyst Ratings Are Not All the Sameanalyst ratingsequal weight vs hold ratingFINRA: Research AnalystsOpen source
2026-09-07Reiterated vs Maintained Analyst Rating: Is There Any Difference?analyst ratingsreiterated analyst rating meaningFINRA: Research AnalystsOpen source
2026-09-07Average vs Median Analyst Price Target: Which Consensus Number Is Better?analyst ratingsaverage vs median analyst price targetFINRA: Research AnalystsOpen source
2026-09-06Price Target Upside and Downside: How the Percentage Is Calculatedanalyst ratingsprice target upside calculationFINRA: Research AnalystsOpen source
2026-09-06Analyst Estimate Revisions vs Rating Changes: Which Signal Matters More?analyst ratingsanalyst estimate revisionsFINRA: Research AnalystsOpen source
2026-09-06Analyst Coverage Initiated at Buy or Hold: What an Initiation Meansanalyst ratingsanalyst coverage initiatedFINRA: Research AnalystsOpen source
2026-09-06Price Target Raised but Rating Maintained: What the Analyst Is Actually Sayinganalyst ratingsprice target raised rating maintainedFINRA: Research AnalystsOpen source
2026-09-06Snowflake's AI Growth Surprise Triggers a Wall Street Price-Target Resetanalyst ratingsSnowflake price targetsSEC: Snowflake Q2 fiscal 2027 earnings releaseOpen source
2026-09-05The Biggest Nvidia Price Targets on Wall Street in 2026analyst ratingsNvidia price targets 2026Benzinga: Nvidia analyst price targetsOpen source
2026-09-05Nvidia Price Targets Are Spreading Out. Wall Street Is Pricing Very Different AI Outcomesanalyst ratingsNvidia price targets September 2026Benzinga: Nvidia analyst price targetsOpen source
2026-09-04Broadcom Price Targets Split After Its AI Revenue Forecastanalyst ratingsBroadcom analyst price targetsBroadcom AI revenue and analyst reactionOpen source
2026-09-04Nvidia Gets a $500 Baird Price Target as AI Infrastructure Demand Stays in Focusanalyst ratingsNvidia analyst price targetBaird reiterates Outperform and $500 targetOpen source
2026-08-28Nvidia Got a Wall of Target Raises. The Estimates Matter More Than the Headlines.analyst ratingsNvidia price target upgradesReuters: Nvidia sparks chip rally after strong forecastOpen source
2026-08-27Meta's Analysts Are Starting to Put a Value on Spare AI Computeanalyst ratingsMeta analyst ratingsMarketWatch: Evercore raises Meta target on AI compute optionalityOpen source
2026-08-21Broadcom's New Bull Case Is Becoming a Custom-AI-Chip Storyanalyst ratingsBroadcom analyst ratingsBroadcom analyst price targetsOpen source
2026-08-18Tesla's Analyst Range Is So Wide That the Average Target Is Nearly Uselessanalyst ratingsTesla analyst ratingsTesla analyst price targetsOpen source
2026-08-17Morgan Stanley Names Nvidia, Broadcom and Astera Labs as Its Top Chip Stocks for 2026analyst ratingsMorgan Stanley chip stocksMorgan Stanley research and ideasOpen source
2026-08-14Micron's Analysts Are Bullish, but They Cannot Agree on the Right Numberanalyst ratingsMicron analyst ratingsMicron analyst price targetsOpen source
2026-08-12Semiconductor Price Targets Keep Rising. Ratings Mostly Don't.analyst ratingsanalyst ratingsFINRA — understanding analyst recommendationsOpen source
2026-08-10Oracle Kept Its Buy Rating Even as UBS Cut the Target. That Is the Point.analyst ratingsOracle analyst ratingsOracle analyst price targetsOpen source
2026-08-06AMD's Price Targets Jumped. The Market Is Pricing a Bigger AI Role.analyst ratingsAMD analyst ratingsAMD analyst ratings and targetsOpen source
2026-08-04Palantir's Earnings Triggered Real Upgrades, Not Just Higher Targetsanalyst ratingsPalantir analyst ratingsReuters: Palantir raises annual revenue forecastOpen source
2026-07-31Amazon's New Price Targets Put More Weight on AWS Than Retailanalyst ratingsAmazon analyst ratingsAmazon analyst price targetsOpen source
2026-07-30Microsoft Price Targets Rose After Earnings, but the Range Still Mattersanalyst ratingsMicrosoft analyst ratingsMicrosoft analyst price targetsOpen source
2026-06-24Analyst Ratings Explained: What Buy, Hold and Sell Actually Meananalyst ratingsanalyst ratings explainedFINRA research analyst informationOpen source
2026-06-10How Stock Price Targets Work and Why They Changeanalyst ratingshow stock price targets workFINRA research analystsOpen source
2026-05-27Analyst Consensus Explained: Ratings, Targets and Estimate Dispersionanalyst ratingsanalyst consensus explainedFINRA research analystsOpen source
2026-05-12Stock Upgrades and Downgrades: Which Changes Actually Matter?analyst ratingsstock upgrades and downgradesFINRA research analystsOpen source

Dataset methodology

Scope

Published GMR research where a named brokerage action, price-target change, consensus measure or analyst-rating framework is central to the article.

Inclusion criteria

Each record must retain publication date, underlying company and attributable brokerage or consensus source.

Exclusions and limitations

Unattributed targets, stale screenshots and inferred analyst views are excluded. A target is never presented as a guaranteed future price.

Revision policy

Brokerage actions remain dated historical records. New actions are appended rather than overwriting the previous research context.

Reuse and attribution

Journalists, researchers and analysts may quote figures with attribution to Global Markets Review, the dataset version and review date. For substantial republication, chart reuse or data licensing, contact editor@globalmarketsreview.org.