Research and verification

Global Markets Review Research Methodology

How Global Markets Review sources market, company, analyst, index and dividend data, handles dated snapshots and separates reported figures from estimates.

Scope. This page explains how Global Markets Review handles permanent research, datasets, rankings and evidence-heavy reporting. It complements the publication's Editorial Standards, which govern corrections, independence, bylines and assisted production.

Global Markets Review is built for readers comparing companies, earnings, analyst expectations and market structure across the US, UK and Europe. Market information changes quickly, so the publication separates a source observation from the time a page was fetched or reviewed. A fetch timestamp is never presented as the underlying exchange quote timestamp.

Primary documents take priority over commentary. Company filings, investor-relations releases, exchanges, index providers, regulators and central banks are used before secondary summaries wherever the underlying information is public. Unsupported market fields are left unavailable rather than filled with generated or inferred values.

Primary-source hierarchy

Sources are chosen according to the subject and the claim being made. The following source types normally receive priority, with the most specific underlying document preferred over a general summary.

  1. Company annual reports, quarterly reports, regulatory filings and investor-relations releases
  2. Exchange and index-provider rulebooks, constituent information and methodology documents
  3. Central-bank, regulator and official statistical releases
  4. Validated market-data feeds or dated reference snapshots where their source and currency are known
  5. Reputable secondary reporting only when primary documentation is unavailable or when reporting itself is the relevant event

Core research rules

Market prices and valuation

Prices, market capitalisation, valuation multiples and analyst fields are displayed only when the source, currency and observation context are sufficiently clear. Delayed information is labelled as such. ADRs, primary listings and local-currency securities are not treated as interchangeable. A USD ADR must not inherit a EUR target or fundamental value merely because the companies are related.

Analyst ratings and targets

Buy, Hold and Sell labels are analyst opinions, not factual outcomes. Consensus values are treated as aggregates of available estimates, and price-target changes are separated from earnings-estimate revisions. A routine model roll-forward is not described as a new fundamental view unless the supporting research indicates one.

Earnings and guidance

Reported results are distinguished from company guidance, analyst forecasts and management targets. Periods are matched before comparison. Revenue, orders, bookings, backlog, free cash flow and adjusted earnings are not substituted for one another.

Indices and rankings

Index membership and weighting descriptions follow the relevant provider. Company rankings state the observation date, currency and inclusion rule. Mixed reporting periods are identified rather than presented as a perfectly synchronous league table.

Dataset and permanent-reference rules

Global Stock Index Reference

The index reference records provider, broad market coverage and high-level construction. It does not publish a live index level. Provider methodology takes precedence if an eligibility, weighting or review rule changes.

Stock and dividend research

Dividend yield, payment history and reinvestment examples preserve the price date and assumptions used. Calculators are scenario tools based on user inputs and are not personalised investment advice.

Review dates, corrections and refreshes

Permanent market reference pages are reviewed when the underlying provider, company disclosure or validated data source changes. A page is not given a new review date for cosmetic edits. Material corrections retain the original publication context and explain what changed where necessary.

Where a material factual error is identified, the correction process follows the Editorial Standards. Research pages are not given a newer date simply to create an appearance of freshness.

Network-wide quality gate

Meridian Review Group Information Gain Standard

A publication-wide quality gate for research, rankings, explainers and evidence-led reporting. New pages should add verifiable information, structure or analysis that a reader could not obtain by merely restating the same source material.

Add a new fact, comparison or structure

Every authority page should contribute at least one material element beyond a generic summary: an original dataset, a ranked or normalised comparison, a historical series, a project-stage classification, a source reconciliation, a geographic breakdown, or a clearly reasoned synthesis across multiple sources.

Prefer primary evidence

Company filings, regulators, government datasets, official project disclosures, investor materials and other first-party records should establish factual claims wherever practical. Secondary reporting can add context, challenge claims or fill gaps, but should not replace an available primary source without a reason.

Preserve provenance

Numbers must retain their observation date, source and qualification. Announced investment is not treated as completed spending, planned capacity is not operating capacity, and group-wide figures are not silently assigned to one site, country or subsidiary.

Make definitions explicit

Rankings, trackers and databases must explain what is included, what is excluded and how ambiguous categories are handled. Terms such as largest, capacity, investment, employer, headquarters, analyst consensus and project stage should be operationally defined.

Show uncertainty instead of inventing precision

Missing values remain missing unless a defensible calculation is explicitly labelled. Estimates, ranges and inferred values must be distinguished from disclosed figures. Conflicting sources should be surfaced rather than averaged into false certainty.

Keep a time dimension

Materially changing subjects should retain review dates, historical observations or event histories so readers and machines can distinguish a current state from a previous disclosure.

Connect the evidence graph

High-value pages should link to the relevant authority hub, supporting analysis, persistent entities, methodology and primary-source evidence. New pages should strengthen an existing topic graph rather than exist as isolated search landings.

Do not publish thin variants

A new page should not exist solely because a keyword has a slightly different wording. Overlapping intent should be consolidated into the strongest canonical resource unless the new page has a genuinely different dataset, audience task, geography, time frame or analytical question.

Publication gate before a new authority URL is created

  1. What verifiable information or structure does this page add that is not already present elsewhere in the archive?
  2. Can the important quantitative claims be traced to a source and observation date?
  3. Are scope, definitions and exclusions clear enough for another analyst to reproduce the classification?
  4. Does the page distinguish disclosed facts from estimates, interpretation and commentary?
  5. Does the page belong to an existing authority cluster and link back into that cluster?
  6. Would merging this material into an existing canonical page produce a better resource than publishing a separate URL?

Default decision: if a proposed page cannot clear these questions, the preferred action is to strengthen, update or consolidate an existing canonical resource instead of publishing another thin URL.

Connected research
Research layer

Research & Data

Permanent datasets, directories and reference material maintained under this methodology.

Signature cluster

Wall Street Expectations, Earnings and Company Valuation

Global Markets Review's signature cluster connects analyst ratings with the company fundamentals and market structures underneath them. Instead of treating a target-price change as a standalone headline, the cluster links research actions to earnings revisions, company reference pages, index context and durable investing guides. That gives readers a route from what an analyst changed to the assumptions, companies and market benchmarks needed to judge whether the change matters.

Global Markets Review Research Methodology | Global Markets Review